Without explaining why it applies here, the Department asks the Court to apply the Chevron framework to its understanding of Title II....
Search Results "Court"
Filters
Commonly Searched Documents
-
B.
-
I. RECITALS
the "Superior Court"), Case No....
-
19. Dispute Resolution
If the Parties are unable to reach agreement on a mediator, each side may submit three (3) names of proposed mediators to the District Court and the District Court shall select the mediator...
-
D. FINDINGS ON THE MERITS
The Court agrees, and finds that Kirola has failed to establish that she is entitled to relief on any of the claims alleged in the FAC. 23 98....
-
C. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The Court has jurisdiction of this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345 and 42 U.S.C. § 12133. ...
-
4. Substitution of Class Representative
As support, Kirola cites several cases where courts permitted such a substitution where the class representative's claims became moot. E.g., United States Parole Comm'n v....
-
OBJECTIONS TO THE SETTLEMENT
and speaking to the Court about your objection; or (2) filing a written objection with the District Court and serving Class Counsel with a copy....
-
§100.147(a)
(a) A court of competent jurisdiction; or...
-
C. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The Court has jurisdiction of this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345 and 42 U.S.C. § 12133. ...
-
Spaces and Elements: ADA Standard Section 206.2.4
Section 206.2.4 covers the scoping requirements in the most current ADA Standards for accessible routes connecting spaces and elements within a building.
-
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION
The class action settlement ("Settlement Agreement"), which must be approved by the United States District Court, was reached in the case entitled Willits v....
-
Effective Date
“Effective Date” is the date the Consent Decree is approved by the Court....
-
E. EXPERT TESTIMONY
Mastin is a licensed architect and was received by the Court as an expert in architecture, construction, disability access, program access for mobility disabled persons, ADA transition plans...
-
Civil Lawsuits
An individual may go directly to court. Title II does not require complainants to go through the federal administrative process before suing....
-
§35.130(f) (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Several commenters asked for clarification that the costs of interpreter services may not be assessed as an element of "court costs."...
-
12188(b)(5) Judicial consideration
(5) Judicial consideration In a civil action under paragraph (1)(B), the court, when considering what amount of civil penalty, if any, is appropriate, shall give consideration to any...
-
Sec.36.504(d) Judicial consideration
In a civil action under Sec.36.503, the court, when considering what amount of civil penalty, if any, is appropriate, shall give consideration to any good faith effort or attempt to comply...
-
§ 36.504(d) Judicial consideration
In a civil action under §36.503, the court, when considering what amount of civil penalty, if any, is appropriate, shall give consideration to any good faith effort or attempt to comply...
-
16(j)
monitoring described in subparagraphs 16(g) and (h) (to the extent surveys are submitted or plans completed later than four years after the Effective Date) and make annual reports to the Court...
-
III. Background
As a result of these Supreme Court decisions, lower courts ruled in numerous cases that individuals with a range of substantially limiting impairments were not individuals with disabilities...
-
United States of America v. State of Florida - Final Order of Dismissal
The Court has carefully reviewed the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises....
-
What are federal observers?
They prepare reports that may be filed in court, and they can serve as witnesses in court if the need arises....
-
12101(a)(6)
L. 110-325, § 2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that: (6) as a result of these Supreme Court cases, lower courts have incorrectly found in individual cases that people with...
-
Is it prohibited to draw majority-minority districts?
Over 30 years ago the Supreme Court held that jurisdictions are free to draw majority-minority election districts that follow traditional, non-racial districting considerations, such as...