Aircraft with 100 or more passenger seats must have priority storage space within the cabin to stow at least one passenger’s folding wheelchair [Sec. 382.21(a)(2)] and DOT has interpreted...
Search Results "Oral Interpreter"
-
A. Aircraft Accessibility
-
§35.130(d) and §35.130(e) (Section-by-Section Analysis)
expressed concern that §35.130(e), which states that nothing in the rule requires an individual with a disability to accept special accommodations and services provided under the ADA, could be interpreted...
-
§35.103 Relationship to other laws (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The inclusion of specific language in this part, however, should not be interpreted as an indication that a requirement is not included under a regulation implementing section 504....
-
Telecommunications. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
may provide more effective communication than existing technology and that providing effective communication often will include use of new technology and video relay services, as well as interpreters...
-
3. The Legislative History of the ADA
Therefore, the isolated statement that open captioning of films in movie theaters was not required in 1990 cannot be interpreted to mean that [movie theaters] cannot now be expected and...
-
BS8300:2001 Research
Unfortunately, without a research report with details about the research protocols, it is difficult to interpret and compare the results of this interesting study to the others....
-
B. Legal foundation for captioning and video description
The statute defines auxiliary aids to include "qualified interpreters or other effective methods of making aurally delivered materials available to individuals with hearing impairments"...
-
Complaints
The time frame for a carrier to respond to an oral complaint to a CRO has been expanded to 30 days, making it consistent with the time frame for responding to written complaints....
-
REPORTING AND ENFORCEMENT
contains the entire agreement of the United States and Peapod concerning the subject matter described in Paragraphs 2-4, and no other statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral...
-
E. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT
entire Agreement between the Parties relating to Department of Justice Case No. 202-16-130 on the matters raised herein, and no other statement, promise or agreement, either written or oral...
-
Tips for Assisting People Who Are Blind or Visually-Impaired
For example, if a boarding time is changed and the new boarding time is posted visually at the gate, you must inform the person orally....
-
DISPUTES AND ENFORCEMENT
No other statement, promise, or agreement, either written or oral, made by any Party or agents of any Party, that is not contained in this written Consent Decree shall be enforceable....
-
Ampetronic MLD9 MultiLoop Driver Hearing System
For detailed information on approvals, standards compliance and how to interpret the technical parameters on Ampetronic datasheets, please visit the support section of our website or contact...
-
Subpart F—Certification of State Laws or Local Building Codes (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The certified code, however, remains within the authority < >of the adopting State or local jurisdiction to interpret and enforce: Certification does not transform a State's building...
-
III. DISCUSSION
Agreeing with the DOJ’s interpretation, the Second Circuit found replacements of kitchen floors and bathroom light fixtures to be “alterations” that changed the “usability” of condominium...
-
Section 36.303(g)(5) Performance Requirements for Captioning Devices and Audio Description Devices
approach to performance requirements for captioning and audio description devices is similar to the approach the Department took with respect to performance standards for video remote interpreting...
-
Section 1630.2(j)(1)(iii) Substantial Limitation Should Not Be Primary Object of Attention; Extensive Analysis Not Needed
As the legislative history explains, “[w]e expect that courts interpreting [the ADA] will not demand such an extensive analysis over whether a person's physical or mental impairment constitutes...
-
National Association of the Deaf, Western Massachusetts Association of the Deaf and Hearing Impaired, and Lee Nettles, Plaintiffs v. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant - Statement of Interest
. § 517 because this litigation implicates the interpretation and application of title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., and its implementing...
-
29. Admission and recruitment
First, many commenters expressed concern that §104.42(b)(2)(ii) could be interpreted to require a “global search” for alternate tests that do not have a disproportionate, adverse impact...
-
36 CFR Part 1194 - Proposed Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines NPRM - Preamble
An assistive listening system, communication access real-time translation, and sign language interpreters will be provided....
-
III-7.1000 General
Neither the Department of Justice, nor any other Federal agency, functions as a "building department" to review plans, to issue building permits or occupancy certificates, or to provide interpretations...
-
Section 1193.23 Product design, development and evaluation (Section-by-Section Analysis)
One manufacturer interpreted the section as requiring a "checklist" which would need to be completed for each product. Response....
-
3. The Department of Justice’s Regulatory Developments Reinforce that Netflix is a Public Accommodation
provide auxiliary aids and services necessary for deaf and hard of hearing individuals to enjoy the programs and services at Walt Disney World Resort, including captioning, sign language interpreters...
-
DOT Response
However, the Department does not interpret its rules to require transportation providers to accommodate devices that are not primarily designed or intended to assist persons with mobility...
