. [§35.104 & §36.104] A manually-operated or power-driven device designed primarily for use by an individual with a mobility disability for the main purpose of indoor or of both indoor...
Search Results "DLCC: Disability Law Coordinating Council"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
WHEELCHAIR
-
II-4.3300 Nondiscrimination in selection criteria and the administration of tests
Public entities may not use employment selection criteria that have the effect of subjecting individuals with disabilities to discrimination....
-
UNREASONABLE HARDSHIP
The nature of the use of the facility under construction and its availability to persons with disabilities....
-
Actions to Be Taken by LCG
with disabilities, including children with diabetes, and (ii) LCG child care centers will make reasonable modifications for children with disabilities, including, but not limited to children...
-
Resources
on how to file ADA complaints: 800-669-4000 (Voice); 800-669-6820 (TTY); www.eeoc.gov The Job Accommodation Network (JAN) provides information and advice to employers and people with disabilities...
-
8.2 Expanding Medical Equipment Covered
Access Board’s MDE initiative will work hand-in-hand with the existing requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which already require health...
-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
) to require U.S. air carriers and foreign air carriers to make their Web sites that market air transportation to the general public in the United States accessible to individuals with disabilities...
-
16. Is the IDEA evaluation process different than the analysis used when considering an individual’s request for a particular auxiliary aid or service under Title II?
Under the IDEA, each school district must conduct a full and individual initial evaluation before the initial provision of special education and related services to a child with a disability...
-
3. Relationship between Functional Performance Criteria and Technical Provisions
Commenters objected to this approach, citing the concern that ICT procurements satisfying only the technical requirements would not necessarily ensure sufficient access to individuals with disabilities...
-
7. Definition and Coverage of Technology with “Closed Functionality”
We proposed permitting ICT to have closed functionality; however, such ICT still would need to be accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities without assistive technology....
-
Abstract
Abstract Trails provide opportunities for people to connect with the natural environment in a variety of settings and are places for all individuals, including people with disabilities...
-
D. STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS
Lewisboro's programs, services, and activities operating at a facility that is the subject of this Agreement, when viewed in its entirety, is readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities...
-
1.5 Materials
Table 3 shows the chromaticity coordinates and reflectance factors of the materials used in this study....
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories (HERL) PneuMobility
-
6.2 Presentations that Informed the Minimum Height Deliberations
Table 6.2(b) Presentations by Manufacturers and Engineers to the Advisory Committee Name and Affiliation Title of Presentation Date Willa Crolius, Coordinator...
-
Trail Study Sites
An accessibility coordinator for the Wisconsin State Parks offered us an opportunity not far from the Forest Products Laboratory, at Governor Dodge State Park in Dodgeville, Wisconsin--to...
- National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS)
-
Appendix Three: Bibliography
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Special Issue on Anthropometry and Disability 33(3): 181‒190. Feathers, D. (2005)....
- American Society of Interior Designers (ASID)
-
(2) Transfer Surface Location for Diagnostic Equipment Used in the Seated Position
The American Dental Association urge[d] the Access Board to refrain from proposing costly new requirements based on examination chairs that are only ‘moderately difficult’ for disabled patients...
-
I. BACKGROUND
The complainants in this matter are deaf, and are individuals with disabilities within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 12102(1)(A) and its implementing regulation 28 C.F.R. Part 36....
-
I. BACKGROUND AND JURISDICTION
This matter was initiated as a result of complaints filed under title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§12181-12189, with the United States Attorney's...
-
Provisions of the Final Rule
First, the entity must make information about the process, and how to use it, readily available to the public, including individuals with disabilities....