., Chair, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board adds part 1194 to Chapter XI of title 36 of the Code of Federal...
Search Results "Accessibility Code"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1194
-
11B-206.4.10 Medical care and long-term care facilities
and Development (OSHPD), which has jurisdiction over hospitals and long-term care facilities in California, has issued Code Application Notice CAN 2-11B, dated 9/9/14, which includes the...
-
101.2 Effect on Removal of Barriers in Existing Facilities
Removal of architectural barriers, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. s. 36.304, from buildings, structures or facilities shall comply with this code’s requirements for alterations unless compliance...
-
Technical Infeasibility
Technical Infeasibility Other examples where compliance could potentially be technically infeasible include: conflicts with applicable building, plumbing, life safety or other codes...
-
11B-802.1.5 Overlap
The term "circulation paths" used in Section 11B-802.1.5 means aisle width required by applicable building or life safety codes for the specific assembly occupancy....
- American Trails Resources and Library: Accessible Trails
- National Center on Accessibility at Indiana University Bloomington
- Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Accessible Public Transportation
- Tobii PCEye Go: Access Your Computer or Tablet Through Gaze Interaction Video
-
Medical Care and Other Services for Persons with Mobility Impairments
Greater access is required at outpatient facilities (10%) and those that specialize in serving people with mobility impairments (20%) since the need for accessible parking is usually greater...
-
ENSURING LANGUAGE ACCESS AND EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION DURING RESPONSE AND RECOVERY: A CHECKLIST FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.1 These services may include providing language access services2 to provide meaningful access...
-
11B-604.5.1 Side wall
requires a nurse call device at the side wall of a water closet that must be coordinated carefully with the side grab bar at an accessible water closet to ensure that accessible clearances...
-
§ 36.606(d)
(d) When the standards of the Act against which a code is deemed equivalent are substantially revised or amended, a certification of equivalency issued under the preexisting standards is...
-
§ 36.606(d)
(d) When the standards of the Act against which a code is deemed equivalent are revised or amended substantially, a certification of equivalency issued under the preexisting standards is...
-
11B-212.3 Sinks
Scrub sinks, as defined in California Plumbing Code Section 221.0, shall not be required to comply with Section 11B-606....
- Emergency Planning for People with Access and Functional Needs
- Willoughby Industries ASUW-1314-HEU-FA-BS Contoured High Efficiency Urinal with Washout Flush
-
11B-805.7 Built-in cabinets and work surfaces
Built-in cabinets, counters and work surfaces shall be accessible, including: patient wardrobes, nurse’s stations, administrative centers, reception desks, medicine preparation areas, laboratory...
-
1010.1.4 Floor elevation
At exterior doors serving Groups F, H, R-2 and S and where such doors are not part of an adaptable or accessible route or, not required to be accessible by Chapter 11A or 11B of the California...
-
Hospitality Accessibility Blog Reviewer
I'm in the process (very preliminary) of creating a blog where I expand on some constructability issues/solutions/pricing as it relates to accessibility in the hospitality product type....
-
Sec.36.606(a)
(a) If the Assistant Attorney General makes a Preliminary determination to deny certification of a code under Sec.36.604, he or she shall notify the submitting official of the determination...
- Access 2 Independence (A2i) - Columbus, GA
-
Issue 22: How is accessibility for persons with low vision assessed during the design review process?
[That person mistakenly] told me that it was the manager, not the regional accessibility officer, who decided whether they wanted to review projects for accessibility or not....