Mirrors located above lavatories or countertops shall be installed with the bottom edge of the reflecting surface 40 inches (1016 mm) maximum above the finish floor or ground....
Search Results "Court Floor Holding Cell"
Filters
Commonly Searched Documents
-
11B-603.3 Mirrors
-
Thresholds: ADA Standard Section 608.7
Section 608.7 covers the current ADA Standards for thresholds in shower compartments.
-
Bathtub Seats: ADA Standard Section 610.2
Section 610.2 covers the current ADA Standards for bathtub seats.
-
Dispensers: ADA Standard Section 604.9.6
Section 604.9.5 covers the current ADA Standards for dispensers in children's use toilet compartments.
-
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
Interior accessible routes may include corridors, hallways, floors, ramps, elevators and lifts....
-
11B-217.4.1 Bank requirement
[2010 ADA Standards] EXCEPTION: TTYs shall not be required at banks of telephones located within 200 feet (61 m) of, and on the same floor as, a bank containing a public TTY....
-
11B-610.2 Bathtub seats
The top of bathtub seats shall be 17 inches (432 mm) minimum and 19 inches (483 mm) maximum above the bathroom finish floor....
-
11B-608.7 Thresholds
maximum shall be permitted in transfer type shower compartments in existing facilities where provision of a ½ inch (12.7 mm) high threshold would disturb the structural reinforcement of the floor...
-
11B-411.2.3.2 Car designation signs
Car designation signs complying with Sections 11B-703.2 and 11B-703.4.1 shall be provided on both jambs of the hoistway immediately below the floor designation....
-
11B-903.6 Structural strength
Benches shall be affixed to the wall or floor....
-
L. Controls
Are all drapery control wands, fixed lamps and HVAC controls in accessible guestrooms placed within 54" of the floor for side approach or 48" of the floor for forward approach so persons...
-
4.34.6.4(1)
(1) The counter shall be mounted at a maximum height of 34 in (865 mm) above the floor, measured from the floor to the top of the counter surface, or shall be adjustable or replaceable as...
-
E. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT
a resolution within 30 days of the date of the United States' written notification, the United States may seek enforcement of the terms of this Agreement in any United States District Court...
-
c) Aquatic Program
The Court finds that Kimbrough's testimony fails to demonstrate a denial of program access....
-
Identify Departments and Programs
A state judiciary will have many courts and might provide other services such as mediation, divorce education, legal training and a court newsletter....
-
Element-by-Element Safe Harbor for Existing Facilities
These include swimming pools, play areas, exercise machines, court sport facilities, and boating and fishing piers....
-
2.2.3 Functional Reach
reach envelope required that the reach envelope be measured relative to certain environmental, wheelchair and personal features (e.g. 3-D envelopes measured relative to a point on the floor...
-
9.6 ATTENDANCE-RECORDING EQUIPMENT
racks, log books, and other work assignment or attendance-recording equipment used by people in wheelchairs must be installed at a height no more than 48 in (1220 mm) above the finished floor...
-
Air Carrier Access Act
Department of Transportation, or by bringing a lawsuit in Federal court. For more information or to file a complaint, contact: Aviation Consumer Protection Division, C-75 U.S....
-
e) UPhAS
The Court thus finds that Kirola's has not shown that she suffered any injury that stems from UPhAS....
-
907.2.8 Group R-1
attic and crawl spaces are separated from each other and public or common areas by at least 1-hour fire partitions and each individual guestroom has an exit directly to a public way, exit court...
-
23. Entire Agreement
This Settlement Agreement cannot be amended, modified or supplemented except by a written document signed by all of the Parties and approved by the District Court....
-
WILLITS, et al v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES - Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO....
-
NPRM
., 2003), where the court determined that the transit authority could exclude from its vehicles a wheelchair that did not meet the common wheelchair criteria, even if the vehicle could physically...