Designing employee work areas to be more accessible at the outset will avoid more costly retrofits when current employees become temporarily or permanently disabled, or when new employees...
Search Results "Retrofit"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
11B-203.9 Employee workstations
-
Comments
Many commenters assumed that the proposal would require level-entry boarding to be instituted at all or almost all stations, necessitating retrofit at many existing stations....
-
Section 36.403 Alterations: Path of Travel
36.403(a)(1) stated that if a private entity has constructed or altered required elements of a path of travel in accordance with the 1991 Standards, the private entity is not required to retrofit...
-
General description of monetized benefits for water closet clearance in single-user toilet rooms—in-swinging doors (Req. # 32)
Due to the general element-by-element safe harbor provision in the final rules, no unaltered single-user toilet rooms that comply with the current 1991 Standards will be required to retrofit...
-
General description of monetized benefits for water closet clearance in single-user toilet rooms—in-swinging doors (Req. # 32)
Due to the general element-by-element safe harbor provision in the final rules, no unaltered single-user toilet rooms that comply with the current 1991 Standards will be required to retrofit...
- Stanley SB600 Bifolding Door
- Caroma® USA H2 Zero Waterless Urinal
- Sargent 281 Series Cast Iron Door Closer
- Ampetronic TalkPerfect Duplex Intercom, Speech Transfer System
-
§35.150 Existing Facilities
It allowed recipients to make their federally assisted programs and activities available to individuals with disabilities without extensive retrofitting of their existing buildings and facilities...
-
Section 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel--safe harbor
, the Department included a provision that stated that public entities that have brought required elements of path of travel into compliance with the 1991 Standards are not required to retrofit...
-
Maximum side reach ranges. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
noted that thousands of businesses have already internalized the cost of lowering operating controls from 60 inches to 54 inches to comply with the 1991 Standards, and that an additional retrofit...
-
Section 35.150(b)(2) Safe Harbor (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Department proposes in § 35.150(b)(2) that if elements in an existing facility are in compliance with either the 1991 Standards or UFAS, the public entity is not required to alter--or retrofit...
-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The final rule does not require passenger railroads to retrofit existing platforms....
-
Section 36.403 Alterations: Path of Travel (Section-by-Section Analysis)
36.403(a)(1) stated that if a private entity has constructed or altered required elements of a path of travel in accordance with the 1991 Standards, the private entity is not required to retrofit...
-
Section 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel—safe harbor (Section-by-Section Analysis)
, the Department included a provision that stated that public entities that have brought required elements of path of travel into compliance with the 1991 Standards are not required to retrofit...
-
Speech Output
Since the specifications apply not only to new ATMs, but to altered machines as well, commenters expressed concern about the cost and feasibility of retrofitting existing machines as part...
- Behavioral Safety Products #SF380 Ligature Resistant Metering Faucet
- Behavioral Safety Products #SF370 Ligature Resistant Sensor Faucet
- Wikk Industries Ingress'r Automatic Door Control
- Stanley Magic-Forceâ„¢ Full or Low Energy Swing Door Operator
- Allegion Falcon T-Series Mechanical Locks
- TownSteel TDC 40, CAST IRON Grade 1 Door Closer
-
202.4 Alterations Affecting Primary Function Areas
facility that have been previously constructed or altered in accordance with the April 1, 1994 Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS) they will enjoy safe harbor and are not required to be retrofitted...