On the surfaces objectively measured as firm and stable, subjects with higher fitness levels had lower heart rate and RPE scores (i.e., walking was less difficult)....
Search Results "Protruding Object"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
Characteristics of Study Participants
-
ADA Basic Building Blocks Course - Project of the ADA National Network
Credit: CEU 0.5 - Requirements; CRCC 3.5 - Requirements Objectives The course is designed to provide you with the basic principles and core concepts of the Americans with Disabilities...
-
Weight Scales
assessment that the benefits of the proposed standards will justify the costs; that the proposed standards will impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining the regulatory objectives...
-
Legal standard for other power-driven mobility devices. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Advocacy and nonprofit groups almost universally objected to the use of a general reasonableness standard with regard to the assessment of whether a particular device should be allowed at...
-
382.51 What requirements must carriers meet concerning the accessibility of airport facilities?
The individuals and disability organizations that filed comments strongly objected to different standards for audio-visual equipment in areas open to all passengers versus areas with restricted...
-
A. Final Regulatory Assessment (EO 13563 and EO 12866)
regulation only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs; tailor the regulation to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining the regulatory objectives...
-
3. Discussion of Comments on Related Fair Housing Issues Compliance Deadline
Many commenters objected to the March 13, 1991 compliance deadline on the basis that this deadline was unreasonable....
-
1. Application of Functional Performance Criteria: 508 Standards
While some commenters supported this approach, industry groups objected to it as unworkable....
-
Design of Shared Use Paths, Street Intersections, and Midblock Crossings
Object Height B. Horizontal Alignment 1. General Considerations a. Superelevation b. Friction Factors 2. Design Considerations 3....
-
FOREWORD
Trademarks or manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document....
-
I. Executive Summary
The revised language clarifies that the term ‘‘disability’’ shall be interpreted broadly and explains that the primary object of attention in cases brought under the ADA should be whether...
- Canine Assistants
-
Expert Report of Ken Schoonover, P.E., KMS Associates, Inc. (August 7, 2018)
Hallways & Corridors: The pedestrian route from the entrance to the voting area contains a counter and two drinking fountains that protrude more than 4 inches into the route and the...
-
I. Background
been mounted at doors at exit passageways, exit discharge, and exit stairways; room identification signs and soda vending machines have been lowered so that controls are ADA compliant; objects...
- AccessRec LLC WaterWheels, the Floating Beach Wheelchair - Assembly
- Excel Dryer, Inc. LEXAN® Series Hand Dryers
- Beneficial Designs The Universal Trail Assessment Process (UTAP)
- Audio Description Associates Audio Description Services
-
Section 1193.39 Prohibited reduction of accessibility, usability and compatibility [1193.29 in the NPRM] (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Manufacturers, on the other hand, uniformly objected to it....
-
Paragraph (h) Non-interference with hearing technologies (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Some manufacturers also objected to the requirement's coverage of bystanders as outside the Act's jurisdiction....
-
15. When may an employer refuse to hire, terminate, or temporarily restrict the duties of a person who has or had a hearing impairment because of safety concerns?
threat" is a significant risk of substantial harm to the individual or others that cannot be eliminated or reduced through reasonable accommodation.[29] This determination must be based on objective...
-
Section 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel--safe harbor
A substantial number of commenters objected to the Department’s imposition of a safe harbor for alterations to facilities of public entities that comply with the 1991 Standards....
-
C. The 2014 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Movie Captioning and Audio Description
Most commenters also objected to the Department's proposed 6-month compliance date. 18....
-
4. Exception from the Requirements of M301 for Certain Examination Chairs that Comply with M302
These commenters argued that requiring the equipment to be designed to accommodate transfer in both positions would not achieve any objective benefit and would impose transfer surface width...