As the Court previously held, Defendants’ entrances on raised porches violate the provision of the 1991 Standards governing accessible public entrances. ...
Search Results "Court Sport"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
B. The 2010 Standards Regarding Public Entrances Are Intended To Achieve the Same Result As the 1991 Standards Regarding Public Entrances
-
NEISS Data
injury diagnosis, ED disposition (treated and released, or admitted to the hospital), and the locale of the accident (home, farm/ranch, street or highway, school, place of recreation or sports...
-
Platform Lifts
recreation and play facilities that permit platforms lifts to be used to provide access to amusement rides (206.7.7), play equipment and structures (206.7.8), team or player seating areas in sports...
-
Grab Bar and Backrest Evaluation
Also, a comparative analysis was done to investigate differences between the veteran population that was tested at the National Disabled Veterans Winter Sports Clinic and the population...
- California Department of Fair Employment and Housing
-
a) Public Right-of-Way
Based on the record presented at trial, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to establish a lack of program access with regard to the City's public right-of-way, i.e., its system of...
-
Lines of Sight for Wheelchair Spaces
In addition, an exception from the lines of sight and dispersion requirements is provided for wheelchair spaces in team or player seating areas serving areas of sports activity....
-
Substantially Limited in Working
In keeping with the findings and purposes of the Amendments Act, the determination of coverage under the law should not require extensive and elaborate assessment, and the EEOC and the courts...
-
Section 36.208 Direct Threat (Preamble, Section-by-Section Analysis)
This paragraph codifies the standard first applied by the Supreme Court in School Board of Nassau County v....
-
B. Defendant is Covered Under Title III Because it Owns and Operates its Watch Instantly Service; Other Control Arguments Are Not Supported or Are Inappropriate for Judgment on the Pleadings
P. 12(c), the court must accept the non-movant’s well-pleaded facts as true and draw all reasonable inferences in its favor....
-
ADA Safe Harbor Provisions
(3) Accessible route in court sports facilities, section 206.2.12. 35.151(b)(2) (2) The path of travel requirements of § 35.151(b)(4) shall apply only to alterations undertaken...
-
3. The Release Provisions are Overbroad
rules, or regulations, if applicable] concerning any of the Settling Defendant’s Facility (ies) that have been or could have been brought or asserted in this action, in any action in any court...
-
4. Federal Appellate Case Law Addressing Captioning and Audio Description
In April 2010, the first and only Federal appellate court to squarely address the question of whether captioning and audio description are required in movie theaters under the ADA determined...
-
34. Does an employer have to allow an employee with a disability to work at home as a reasonable accommodation?
Courts have differed regarding whether "work-at-home" can be a reasonable accommodation. Compare Langon v. Department of Health and Human Servs., 959 F.2d 1053, 1060, 2 AD Cas....
-
III. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT
unable to reach a satisfactory resolution of the issue or issues raised within 30 days of the date it provides notice to Lewisboro, it may institute a civil action in federal district court...
-
Title II of the ADA
such entity.12 Title II of the ADA applies to the services, programs, and activities of all state and local governments throughout the United States, including child welfare agencies and court...
-
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
discrimination by such entity.14 Federal financial assistance includes grants, loans, and reimbursements from Federal agencies, including assistance provided to child welfare agencies and the courts...
-
206.2.4 Spaces and Elements
The exception does not apply to areas that are likely to be used by members of the public who are not employees of the court such as jury areas, attorney areas, or witness stands....
- Challenged Athletes Foundation®
- Salsbury Industries Designer Wood Locker Single Tier 3 Wide
- Salsbury Industries Designer Wood Locker Single Tier 1 Wide
-
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Cinemark USA, Inc., Defendant - Consent Order
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CINEMARK USA, INC., Defendant. ...
-
Section 504
It is not necessary to file a complaint with a Federal agency or to receive a "right-to-sue" letter before going to court....