Indirect Costs....
Search Results "Incremental Cost"
-
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
-
4.2.5. Device Replacement
Under an annual device replacement rate of 15 percent, the replacement costs decrease by 21 percent over the 15-year period of the analysis, and the total costs decrease to $80.8 million...
-
4.2.2. High Accessibility Baseline
The incremental cost impact of the rulemaking is also analyzed using the High Accessibility baseline, previously described in Section 3.2.2.3. ...
-
106.5.57 Safe Harbor
or facility that have been previously constructed or altered in accordance with the April 1, 1994 Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS) are not required to be retrofitted to reflect the incremental...
-
Benefits Not Monetized in the Formal Analysis
Among the potential benefits that have been discussed by researchers and advocates are reduced administrative costs due to harmonized guidelines, increased business opportunities, increased...
-
Benefits Not Monetized in the Formal Analysis
Among the potential benefits that have been discussed by researchers and advocates are reduced administrative costs due to harmonized guidelines, increased business opportunities, increased...
-
106.5.25 Disproportionality
Alterations made to provide an accessible path of travel to the altered area will be deemed disproportionate to the overall alteration when the cost exceeds 20% of the cost of the alteration...
-
§ 37.43(e)(1)
(1) Alterations made to provide an accessible path of travel to the altered area will be deemed disproportionate to the overall alteration when the cost exceeds 20 percent of the cost of...
-
4.2.1. Low Accessibility Baseline
As a result, the incremental cost impact is higher than in the primary analysis, which uses the Medium Accessibility baseline. ...
-
11B-202 Existing buildings and facilities
When the adjusted construction cost is less than or equal to the current valuation threshold, as defined in Chapter 2, Section 202, the cost of compliance with Section 11B-202.4 shall be...
-
§ 35.150(b)(2) Safe harbor
Uniform Federal Accessibility Standard, such public entity is not, solely because of the Department's adoption of the proposed standards, required to retrofit such elements to reflect incremental...
-
§ 35.151(b)(4)(iii)(B)(4)
(4) Costs associated with relocating an inaccessible drinking fountain....
-
§ 35.151(b)(4)(iii)(B)(2)
(2) Costs associated with making restrooms accessible, such as installing grab bars, enlarging toilet stalls, insulating pipes, or installing accessible faucet controls;...
-
Tax Credit and Deduction
Eligible expenses may include the cost of undertaking barrier removal and alterations to improve accessibility, providing sign-language interpreters, or making material available in accessible...
-
Section 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel—safe harbor (Section-by-Section Analysis)
stated that public entities that have brought required elements of path of travel into compliance with the 1991 Standards are not required to retrofit those elements in order to reflect incremental...
-
§ 37.43(f)(1)
(1) When the cost of alterations necessary to make a path of travel to the altered area fully accessible is disproportionate to the cost of the overall alteration, then such areas shall...
-
Section 35.150(b)(2) Safe harbor (Section-by-Section Analysis)
These revised requirements reflect incremental changes that were added either because of additional study by the Access Board or in order to harmonize requirements with the model codes....
-
§ 35.151(b)(4)(iii)(B)(1)
(1) Costs associated with providing an accessible entrance and an accessible route to the altered area, for example, the cost of widening doorways or installing ramps;...
-
§ 35.151(b)(4)(v)(B)(2)
(2) Only alterations undertaken on or after March 15, 2011 shall be considered in determining if the cost of providing an accessible path of travel is disproportionate to the overall cost...
-
Side reach (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Many jurisdictions have already incorporated this requirement into their building codes, which these commenters believed would reduce the cost of compliance with the 2010 Standards....
-
Side reach (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Many jurisdictions have already incorporated this requirement into their building codes, which these commenters believed would reduce the cost of compliance with the 2010 Standards....
-
Applying the Forest Service Trails Accessibility Guidelines
Cost is not a valid reason for failing to make a trail accessible. (See BUDGET TIP—Extra cost is not an excuse., page 31.)...
-
§ 35.151(b)(4)(v)(B)(1)
of travel to that area, and subsequent alterations of that area, or a different area on the same path of travel, are undertaken within three years of the original alteration, the total cost...
-
4.1.3. Ongoing Costs
The ongoing annual costs are costs that movie theaters incur in addition to the upfront costs. ...