[See subsections ...]
Search Results "Technically Infeasible"
2010 ADA Definition
Technically Infeasible: With respect to an alteration of a building or a facility, something that has little likelihood of being accomplished because existing structural conditions would require removing or altering a load-bearing member that is an essential part of the structural frame; or because other existing physical or site constraints prohibit modification or addition of elements, spaces, or features that are in full and strict compliance with the minimum requirements.
-
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations, Accessibility: FAQs
-
U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction & Facilities Management Technical Information Library (TIL)
The Technical Information Library (TIL) contains technical publications related to the planning, design, leasing, and construction of VA facilities. ...
-
C.3.i. - Does Section 508 require contractors to manufacture EIT that meets the applicable Access Board’s technical provisions?
Section 508 requires the government to purchase EIT that meets the applicable technical provisions of the Access Board’s standards, with certain exceptions....
-
Subpart B -- Technical Standards (Formerly Subpart B -- Accessibility Standards in the NPRM) (Preamble, Section-by-Section Analysis)
Subpart B -- Technical Standards (Formerly Subpart B -- Accessibility Standards in the NPRM) (Preamble, Section-by-Section Analysis) Comment....
-
Where Platform Lifts are Permitted [§206.7]
boating facilities, and fishing piers and platforms They also are permitted in new construction where topography or other existing exterior site constraints make a ramp or elevator infeasible...
-
206.7.5 Existing Site Constraints
Platform lifts shall be permitted where existing exterior site constraints make use of a ramp or elevator technically infeasible. Advisory 206.7.5 Existing Site Constraints....
-
III-7.7000 Alterations
For instance -- 1) Section 4.1.6(3) contains a detailed set of special technical provisions for alterations to be applied where it is technically infeasible to comply with other provisions...
-
D.2. - Must requiring officials consider all the Access Board’s technical provisions and functional performance criteria each time they purchase EIT?
Requiring officials need only consider all applicable technical provisions from the Access Board’s standards to ensure acquired products provide comparable access (see section B.2.ii, above...
-
G.6.iii. - Can "significant expense" be established simply by demonstrating that a product that meets the applicable technical provisions is significantly more expensive than one that does not?
In determining whether acquisition of EIT that meets all or part of the applicable technical provisions of the Access Board's standards would impose an undue burden, an agency must consider...
-
Floor Plan of Elevator Cars [4.10.9]
In alterations, smaller car sizes (minimum 47 inch width and 69 inch length) are permitted in cases of technical infeasibility, including where limited by existing shaft configurations (...
-
When an addition increases the number of stories or square footage beyond the maximum permitted by the exception, is an accessible route between stories required?
Compliance in an alteration, including with the requirement for an accessible route between stories, is not required where it is “technically infeasible.”...
-
E.5. - Will agencies have a way of obtaining standardized product testing results to determine if EIT meets the Access Board’s technical provisions?
facilitate discussion among the EIT industry, disability advocacy groups, and assistive technology vendors on ways to convey the extent to which particular products (or services) meet the technical...
-
G.8. - Does acquiring maintenance or support services for an existing system trigger the requirement for the existing system to meet the Access Board's technical provisions?
New maintenance and support contracts on legacy systems do not require the previously owned EIT to meet the technical provisions of Subparts B or C of the Access Board's standards....
-
Technical Memorandum TM 2013-20 Valet Parking
TM 2013-20 Valet Parking Effective Date: October 3, 2010 2012 TAS Reference: 208 and 209.4 The 1994 TAS (and 1991 ADAAG) required valet parking facilities to provide...
-
Technical Memorandum TM 2012-05 Safe Harbor
TM 2012-05 Safe Harbor Effective Date: January 22, 2013 2012 TAS Reference: 106.5.57 The following clarifications are provided to address variances issued for...
-
Technical Memorandum TM 2012-07 Press Boxes
TM 2012-07 Press Boxes Effective Date: January 22, 2013 2012 TAS Reference: 206.2.7, Exception 1 and 2 The following clarifications are provided to address references...
-
Technical Memorandum TM 2013-14 Dining Surfaces
TM 2013-14 Dining Surfaces Effective Date: June 1, 2013 2012 TAS Reference: 226 and 902 Dispersion The requirements of TAS 226 and 902 are applicable to fixed or...
-
Technical Memorandum TM 2012-06 Wading Pools
TM 2012-06 Wading Pools Effective Date: January 22, 2013 2012 TAS Reference: 242.3 The 2012 TAS does not provide a specific definition of a wading pool and neither...
-
Technical Memorandum TM 2012-08 Private Clubs
TM 2012-08 Private Clubs Effective Date: January 22, 2013 2012 TAS Reference: 201.1 In accordance with TAS 201.1, the requirements of the Texas Accessibility...
-
4. ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS AND SPACES: SCOPE AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
[See subsections ...]
-
Title III Technical Assistance Manual (with 1994 supplement)
[See subsections ...]
-
Appendix D to 36 CFR part 1191 – Technical
[See subsections ...]
-
11B-705.1.2.2.2.1 One entrance/exit point
Where it is technically infeasible to provide a minimum 72 inches (1828 mm) wide turning space, as measured perpendicular to the curb, the depth of detectable warnings may be reduced to...
-
Section 4.1.6, Alterations (Preamble, Section-by-Section Analysis)
Section 4.1.6(1)(j) deals with technical infeasibility. Section 4.1.6(3) contains special technical provisions for alterations to existing buildings and facilities....
