Advisory 206.2.4 Spaces and Elements Exception 1 explains that the exception allowing raised courtroom stations to be used by court employees, such as judge’s benches, to be adaptable does...
Search Results "Court"
-
Accessible Jury Boxes, Attorney Areas, and Witness Stands
-
J.
The Department filed a lawsuit against Cinemark on March 24, 1999, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, to enforce compliance with the requirements of Title...
-
Will the Voting Rights Act expire?
And in case after case, our courts have held that the right to vote is fundamental. Voting rights will not expire....
-
C.5.i. - Who is responsible for enforcing Section 508? Are there any reporting requirements?
Individuals with disabilities may file a complaint with an agency or bring a civil action in Federal Court for an agency's noncompliance with the requirements of Section 508....
-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY - OPINION & ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRONX INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES, a nonprofit organization; DISABLED IN ACTION OF METROPOLIAN NEW YORK, a nonprofit organization...
-
C. The CVAA Does Not Preempt the ADA or Conflict With the ADA’s Application to This Case
The CVAA Does Not Preempt the ADA or Conflict With the ADA’s Application to This Case This Court has already recognized that the CVAA did not expressly or implicitly preempt the ADA....
-
I.
Cinemark filed suit against the United States in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on January 28, 1999, alleging that the Department's interpretation of...
-
VII. CIVIL PENALTY
The ADA authorizes the Attorney General to seek, and the Court to award, civil penalties of up to $55,000 for a first violation of Title III of the ADA and up to $110,000 for each subsequent...
-
12101(a)(5)
L. 110-325, § 2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that: (5) the holding of the Supreme Court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v....
-
12101(a)(4)
L. 110-325, § 2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that: (4) the holdings of the Supreme Court in Sutton v....
-
Public entities may not discriminate or impose eligibility criteria to screen out people with disabilities
corrections, and justice system leaders have facilitated compliance with this obligation: Forbade use of non-essential eligibility criteria in diversion or re-entry programs that courts...
-
32.1 Q. What types of penalties or monetary damages will be assessed if covered multifamily dwellings are found not to be in compliance with the Fair Housing Act?
Further, a Federal district court judge can order similar relief plus punitive damages as well as civil penalties for up to $100,000 in an action brought by a private individual or by the...
-
22. Enforcement
Counsel may seek to enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement through the dispute resolution process provided for in Section 19 above, up to and including a motion before the District Court...
-
C. Defendants' Transaction Counter
The submissions from the Court and the parties do not clearly state the length of the transaction counter as built. See id....
-
III-8.5000 Attorney's fees
The defendant, however, may not recover attorney's fees unless the court finds that the plaintiff's action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, although it does not have to...
-
15(c)
Any unresolved disputes under this section may be submitted by either Party to the Court within 30 days after the dispute resolution period ends....
-
Q. How are the employment provisions enforced?
Remedies may include hiring, reinstatement, back pay, court orders to stop discrimination, and reasonable accommodation....
-
11B-206.2.4 Spaces and elements
Raised courtroom stations, including judges' benches, clerks' stations, bailiffs' stations, deputy clerks' stations, and court reporters' stations shall not be required to provide vertical...
-
3. Who do Title II of the ADA and Section 504 protect in child welfare programs?
legal guardians, relatives, other caretakers, foster and adoptive parents, and individuals seeking to become foster or adoptive parents, from discrimination by child welfare agencies and courts...
-
Section 1630.2(j)(1)(iv) Individualized Assessment Required, But With Lower Standard Than Previously Applied
The Amendments Act and the EEOC's regulations explicitly reject the standard enunciated by the Supreme Court in Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v....
-
II-7.1000 Equally effective communication.
Courtroom spectators with disabilities are also participants in the court program and are entitled to such aids or services as will afford them an equal opportunity to follow the court proceedings...
-
OTHER PROVISIONS
thirty (30) days from the date it notifies the University of any breach of this Agreement to cure that breach before instituting a civil action in the appropriate United States District Court...
-
A. Background
The Court denied this motion, holding that architects may have liability under title III. United States v. Ellerbe Becket, Inc., 976 F.Supp. 1262 (D. Minn. 1997)....
-
I. Purpose of the Regulatory Action
obligation for public transportation entities receiving Federal financial assistance (see section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act), including the National Passenger Railroad Corporation (Amtrak), courts...