that were opposed to the element-by-element safe harbor proposed that an entity's past efforts to comply with the 1991 Standards might appropriately be a factor in the readily achievable analysis...
Search Results "Regulatory Flexibility Analysis"
Filters
Commonly Searched Documents
-
Element-by-element safe harbor for public accommodations. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
-
2.4.4. Costs Determined to Be De Minimis
As explained below, these costs are expected to be de minimis and are not included in the analysis....
-
Appendix A to Part 35—Guidance to Revisions to ADA Regulation on Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services
Note: This Appendix contains guidance providing a section-by-section analysis of the revisions to 28 CFR part 35 published on September 15, 2010....
-
Section 36.302 Modifications in Policies, Practices, or Procedures (Section-By-Section Analysis and Response to Comments)
Section 36.302 Modifications in Policies, Practices, or Procedures (Section-By-Section Analysis and Response to Comments) Section 36.302 of the rule prohibits the failure to make reasonable...
-
Section 35.151(j) Residential housing for sale to individual owners (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Section 35.151(j) Residential housing for sale to individual owners (Section-by-Section Analysis) Although public entities that operate residential housing programs are subject to title...
-
4.1.4. Per Movie Theater Costs
This section presents the estimated total costs that the average movie theater within each venue type will incur over the 15-year period of analysis. ...
-
4.2.4. Single-Auditorium Movie Theater Unit Costs Including Sony’s Technology
The primary analysis assumes that Single-Auditorium movie theaters will not purchase Sony’s technology because there are less expensive alternatives available (Section 3.4.5). ...
-
5. Alternatives
Table 7 below summarizes the cost estimates for the primary analysis and other evaluated alternatives to the regulation....
-
Applicable standards
Nonetheless, the Department has reviewed the standards and has determined that additional regulatory provisions are necessary to clarify how the Department will apply the 2010 Standards...
-
Section 610 Review.
The Department is also required to conduct a periodic regulatory review pursuant to section 610 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the SBREFA, 5 U.S.C. 610 et seq.....
-
Section 610 Review.
The Department is also required to conduct a periodic regulatory review pursuant to section 610 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the SBREFA, 5 U.S.C. 610 et seq....
-
6.2. Scoping Requirements
Table 6-3 compares the scoping requirements used in the primary analysis with the previous scoping requirements proposed in the 2014 NPRM and used in the Initial RA. ...
-
Equivalent Facilitation [2.2]
This provides flexibility for new technologies and innovative designs solutions that may not have been taken into account when ADAAG was developed....
-
Proposed Guidelines Developed Specifically for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way
As discussed below under the Major Issues, the requirements in the proposed guidelines make allowances for typical roadway geometry and permit flexibility in alterations to existing facilities...
-
Section 1194.22 Web-based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications (Preamble, Section-by-Section Analysis)
Section 1194.22 Web-based Intranet and Internet Information and Applications (Preamble, Section-by-Section Analysis) In the proposed rule, the Board indicated that the EITAAC had recommended...
-
Choice of Option One for Defining "Designed and Constructed for First Occupancy'' (Section-By-Section Analysis and Response to Comments)
Choice of Option One for Defining "Designed and Constructed for First Occupancy'' (Section-By-Section Analysis and Response to Comments) Under the option the Department has chosen for...
-
Conclusions
Conclusions Design criteria based on the univariate analysis of abdomen depth is sufficient if all other clearance dimensions are unbounded (i.e., unrestricted) and abdomen depth is the...
-
D.
Importantly, reasonable modification applies to an entities' own policies and practices, and not regulatory requirements contained in 49 CFR parts 27, 37, 38, and 39, such as complementary...
-
Transfer Devices for Use with Amusement Rides: ADA Standard Section 1002.6
Operators and designers have flexibility in developing designs that will facilitate individuals to transfer onto amusement rides....
-
General Holding Cells and General Housing Cells: ADA Standard Section 232.2
Section 232.2 covers scoping requirements in the current ADA Standards for general holding cells and general housing cells.
-
11B-1002.6 Transfer devices for use with amusement rides
Operators and designers have flexibility in developing designs that will facilitate individuals to transfer onto amusement rides....
-
§1191.1(a)
The Department of Justice adopted the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010 Standards) as the regulatory standards for the new construction and alteration of facilities subject...
-
Section 36.405 Alterations: Historic Preservation
Because those cross-references to the 1991 Standards are no longer applicable, it is necessary in this final rule to provide new regulatory text....
-
§35.190(b)(6)
(6) Department of Justice: all programs, services, and regulatory activities relating to law enforcement, public safety, and the administration of justice, including courts and correctional...