Department's response to these comments is discussed in the Final Regulatory Impact Analysis, which is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Office of the Rules...
Search Results "Rules"
-
Comments on the Costs of Implementation
-
Scoping of residential dwelling units for sale to individual owners. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The Department expects that, after consultation and coordination with HUD, the Department will make a determination in the final rule....
-
C. Functional Performance Criteria
, in this NPRM, to update several functional performance criteria in Chapter 3 to refine some criteria and to make editorial changes necessitated by revisions elsewhere in the proposed rule...
-
Chapter 6: Support Documentation and Services (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The Advisory Committee recommended inclusion of provisions on support documentation and services in the proposed rule. See TEITAC Report, Part 6, Subpt. D, Rec. 1....
-
1.4.2. Minimum Scoping Requirements for Captioning and Audio Description Devices
The Final RA uses these scoping requirements to estimate the costs of the final rule, as presented in Section 3.3.3. ...
-
How are the ADA standards developed?
Prior to publication of the final rule, agencies must review the public comments they have received....
-
68.10. Definitions
1, 1994, 19 TexReg 3485; amended effective December 5, 1999, 24 TexReg 10855; amended effective June 26, 2000, 25 TexReg 6122; repealed effective November 5, 2001, 26 TexReg 8807, new rule...
-
68.30. Exemptions
6, 1998, 23 TexReg 4263; amended effective December 5, 1999, 24 TexReg 10855; amended effective June 26, 2000, 25 TexReg 6122; repealed effective November 5, 2001, 26 TexReg 8807, new rule...
-
68.53. Corrective Modifications Following Inspection
(New rule section effective November 5, 2001, 26 TexReg 8807; amended effective February 1, 2005, 30 TexReg 382; amended effective March 1, 2007, 32 TexReg 884) (a) When corrective modifications...
-
Availability of Copies and Electronic Access
publications order line (202) 272-5434, by pressing 2 on the telephone keypad, then 1, and requesting publication S-40 (Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards Final Rule...
-
Appendix D to Part 37—Construction and Interpretation of Provisions of 49 CFR Part 37
Some sections of the rule are not discussed in the appendix, because they are self-explanatory or we do not currently have interpretive material to provide concerning them....
- Able Privilege, Re-Conceptualizing Disability: Alan Larson at TEDxSFA
-
Covered Entities
This rule pertains only to functions directly related to telecommunications....
-
382.123 What are the requirements concerning priority cabin stowage for wheelchairs and other assistive devices?
Some U.S. carriers have used the so-called “seat-strapping” method of securing passengers’ wheelchairs in the cabin, usually in situations in which, contrary to the existing rule in some...
-
10.4 Coordination Procedures to Avoid Duplicative Complaint Processing Under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act
The joint EEOC-OFCCP rule provides that a complaint of discrimination on the basis of disability filed with OFCCP under Section 503 will be considered a charge filed simultaneously under...
-
Summary of Costs and Benefits
We estimated the additional costs for FEMA to provide emergency transportable housing units that comply with the final rule compared to units complying with the Uniform Federal Accessibility...
-
Areas of a public entity open to the public, participants in services, programs, or activities, or invitees. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The Department has included a slightly modified version of this provision in § 35.136(g) of the final rule....
-
Section 37.135 Submission of Paratransit Plans
While the rule assumes that most entities will take a year to fully implement these provisions, longer than a year requires the paratransit plans to submit milestones that are susceptible...
-
Volume Control
The Board has retained the 20 decibel specification in this final rule (704.3) for consistency with the ANSI A117.1 standard, the Telecommunications Act Accessibility Guidelines, and the...
-
(1) Adjustability: Minimum High Transfer Height
In the preamble to the MDE NPRM, the Access Board sought comment in question 14 on whether the final rule should require an adjustable height range of 17 inches to 25 inches; whether equipment...
-
M301.4.2 Clearance Around Base (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The proposed rule required a minimum clearance of 6 inches high measured from the floor and 36 inches deep measured from the edge of the examination surface. NPRM, 77 FR at 6927....
-
E. Cost and benefits of website regulations
A formal cost-benefit analysis must include both qualitative and quantitative measurements of the benefits and costs of the proposed rule as well as a discussion of each potentially effective...
-
The Revised Guidelines (2004 ADAAG)
In 1999, based largely on the report and recommendations of the advisory committee,[1] the Access Board issued a proposed rule to update and revise its ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines...
-
Safe harbor for qualified small businesses regarding what is readily achievable. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
In so doing, the Department wishes to promulgate a rule that will benefit a broad class of small businesses by providing a level of certainty in short-term and long-term planning with respect...
