407.12.3.2.1 Height (Section-by-Section Analysis) This section, presented in tabular form (Table 407.12.3.2.1), proposes alternative maximum heights for operable parts with obstructed...
Search Results "Alternative Accessibility Standard"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
407.12.3.2.1 Height (Section-by-Section Analysis)
-
MAY
[DSA-AC] May denotes an option or alternative....
-
MAY
[DSA-AC] May denotes an option or alternative....
- The RERC on Communication Enhancement
-
211 Drinking Fountains
1991 Standards for Accessible Design 2010 Standards for Accessible Design What’s New/Different 4.1.3(10)(a) Where...
-
Improved Engineered Wood Fiber (EWF) Surfaces for Accessible Playgrounds Field Performance Testing: Final Report II
Improved Engineered Wood Fiber (EWF) Surfaces for Accessible Playgrounds Field Performance Testing: Final Report II Field Performance Testing March, 2002 – January, 2003 USDA...
-
Section 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel--safe harbor
by using the 2010 Standards for path of travel work....
-
Section 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel—safe harbor (Section-by-Section Analysis)
by using the 2010 Standards for path of travel work....
-
M301.4 Lift Compatibility
Rationale: The subcommittee recommended the alternate means of using an overhead lift instead of providing clearances for portable lifts because: 1) a ceiling mounted lift can have advantages...
-
4. The Agreements’ Dispute Resolution Mechanism is Burdensome and Unlikely to Afford Complete Relief to Class Members
Second, the dispute resolution provisions set forth "Standards" that the Parties must follow in any dispute resolution procedure. Section V.B(1)....
-
C204.1 General (Section-by-Section Analysis)
While the requirements applicable to Section 255-covered hardware are generally the same as those applied in the 508 Standards, proposed C204.1 provides one exception, which in turn, excepts...
-
11B-809.5.2 Residential dwelling unit smoke detection system and carbon monoxide detection system
ETA Editor's Note The lengthy California Building Code Chapter 9, Section 907.2.11 referenced above is not adopted by Division of the State Architect - Access Compliance (DSA-AC), and...
-
§ 35.151(c)(5)(i)
(i) Newly constructed or altered facilities or elements covered by §§35.151(a) or (b) that were constructed or altered before March 15, 2012, and that do not comply with the 1991 Standards...
-
Standing Supports (M304.3 and M305.3)
b) Would alternative technical criteria for standing supports be appropriate?...
-
H.7 - Are hand held devices (palm tops, cell phones) covered by Section 508?
This technology is "electronic and information technology" covered by Section 508 and the Access Board's standards....
-
5.0 Conclusions
5.0 Conclusions The research demonstrated that there is a need to revise the standards for wheeled mobility access to reflect the body structure and functional abilities of this population...
-
Water Closet Location and Rear Grab Bar
Section 604.2 of the 2010 Standards allows greater flexibility for the placement of the centerline of wheelchair accessible and ambulatory accessible water closets....
-
Alterations—28 CFR 35.151
The 2010 Standards at 28 CFR 35.151(b) and section 202 contain criteria detailing when alterations of facilities must be made accessible....
-
4. Passenger Vessels
Once finalized, these guidelines will supplement the Board’s ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Vehicles....
-
233 Residential Facilities
1991 Standards for Accessible Design 2010 Standards for Accessible Design What’s New/Different Additional Requirements...
-
General: ADA Standard Section 207.1
Section 207.1 of the ADA Standards covers information on scoping requirements for accessible means of egress in the most current ADA Standards.
-
Lawn Seating
The 1991 Standards, at section 4.1.1(1), require all areas of newly constructed facilities to be accessible, but do not contain a specific scoping requirement for lawn seating in assembly...
- Selecting a Kitchen Faucet: Kitchen Faucet Styles
-
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S STATEMENT OF INTEREST ON THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Specifically, this case focuses on whether the raised porches at Defendants’ stores comply with the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010 Standards), which are part of the title...