Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended, generally requires Federal agencies to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis describing...
Search Results "Regulatory Analysis"
Filters
Commonly Searched Documents
-
Regulatory Process Matters
-
Alternate Scenarios
Additionally, a second, more limited alternate baseline analysis in the Final RIA uses a State-specific and requirement-specific alternate IBC/ANSI baseline in order to demonstrate the likely...
-
Alternate Scenarios
Additionally, a second, more limited alternate baseline analysis in the Final RIA uses a State-specific and requirement-specific alternate IBC/ANSI baseline in order to demonstrate the likely...
-
7. FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS
FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS As directed by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), and...
-
Regulatory Process Matters
Regulatory Process Matters...
-
II. Summary of Regulatory Assessment
Thus, the effects that are estimated in this analysis are due to statutory mandates that are not under the Department’s discretion....
-
R302.5.5 Regulatory Constraints
R302.5.5 Regulatory Constraints....
-
VI. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As directed by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), and by Executive Order 13272, the Department...
-
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) and Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
This final rule is not a significant regulatory action. We adhered to the principles of regulation in Executive Orders 13563 and 12866....
-
2.1.1. Parameters
The Final RA uses a 15-year time frame for the cost analysis, which is a time frame similar to that used in the Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Final Revised Regulations Implementing...
-
F. Measures Taken To Limit Impact on Small Entities
In addition to soliciting comments regarding methods to reduce the regulatory impact on small movie theaters, the Department also participated in a roundtable sponsored by the Office of...
-
7.6. Measures Taken to Limit Impact on Small Entities
In addition to soliciting comments regarding methods to reduce the regulatory impact on small movie theaters, the Department also participated in a roundtable sponsored by the Office of...
-
General description of monetized benefits for water closet clearance in single-user toilet rooms—out-swinging doors (Req. #28)
In order to assess monetized benefits for the requirement covering water closet clearances in single-user toilet rooms with out-swinging doors, a determination needed to be made...
-
General description of monetized benefits for water closet clearance in single-user toilet rooms—out-swinging doors (Req. # 28)
In order to assess monetized benefits for the requirement covering water closet clearances in single-user toilet rooms with out-swinging doors, a determination needed to be made...
-
Benefits
The final rule would increase opportunities for individuals with mobility disabilities to participate in outdoor recreation activities with their families and friends. Participation...
-
Regulatory Impact Analysis.
An initial regulatory impact analysis of the costs and benefits of a proposed rule is required by Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 13258 and Executive Order 13422). ...
-
A. Final Regulatory Assessment (EO 13563 and EO 12866)
Important goals of regulatory analysis are to (1) establish whether federal regulation is necessary and justified to achieve a market failure or other social goal and (2) demonstrate that...
-
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) and Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review): Preliminary Regulatory Assessment
objectives; and, in choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select those approaches that maximize net benefits....
-
1. Significant risk of substantial harm
1. Significant risk of substantial harm An employer cannot deny an employment opportunity to an individual with a disability merely because of a slightly increased risk. The...
-
Benefits Not Monetized in the Formal Analysis
Areas where the Department believes entities may incur benefits that are not monetized in the formal analysis include, but may not be limited to, the following: Use benefits accruing...
-
Benefits Not Monetized in the Formal Analysis
Areas where the Department believes entities may incur benefits that are not monetized in the formal analysis include, but may not be limited to, the following: Use benefits accruing...
-
Costs Not Monetized in the Formal Analysis
The absence of a quantitative assessment of such costs in the formal regulatory analysis is not meant to minimize their importance to affected entities; rather, it reflects the inherent...
-
Costs Not Monetized in the Formal Analysis
The absence of a quantitative assessment of such costs in the formal regulatory analysis is not meant to minimize their importance to affected entities; rather, it reflects the inherent...
-
7.1. Purpose and Objective of the Final Rule, Relative to Movie Theaters Categorized As Small
As noted earlier in this Final RA (see Section 1.1), the Department’s existing regulation implementing the ADA’s title III auxiliary aids provision reiterates the obligation of...