In those circumstances where personnel of the public entity believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the service, program, or activity or would result in undue financial...
Search Results "Substantial Proposed Change"
Commonly Searched Documents
-
Undue Burden
-
Additional Design Specifications for Requirement 1
(These design specifications are unchanged from the proposed Option One guidelines for Requirement 1.) Comment....
-
C. Getting Started
Upon arrival at the proposed shelter, first find the areas where people will disembark from vehicles, both passenger drop-off and loading zones as well as parking areas....
-
Alterations to elevators. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Almost all commenters favored the proposed requirement....
-
CASI Accessibility Construction Inspection Checklist
of the existing streets and sidewalks, location of existing buildings, existing drainage and other physical conditions of the property relative to the accessibility improvements on the proposed...
-
CALBO Accessibility Construction Inspection Checklist
of the existing streets and sidewalks, location of existing buildings, existing drainage and other physical conditions of the property relative to the accessibility improvements on the proposed...
-
3.2 Projects with Adjusted Construction Costs Above the Valuation Threshold
The impact of proposed improvements on financial feasibility of the project. 4. The nature of the accessibility which would be gained or lost. 5....
-
Medical Device Manufacturers
The preamble requests comments on the incremental costs to design or redesign and manufacture products that conform to the technical criteria in the proposed standards, as well as alternative...
-
Alterations to elevators. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Most commenters favored the proposed requirement....
-
Areas of a public entity open to the public, participants in services, programs, or activities, or invitees. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
The NPRM proposed at § 35.136(g) that an individual with a disability who uses a service animal has the same right of access to areas of a title II entity as members of the public, participants...
-
Assistive listening systems. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
In the NPRM, the Department proposed adopting the technical specifications in the 2004 ADAAG for ALS that are intended to ensure better quality and effective delivery of sound and information...
-
Assistive listening systems. (Section-by-Section Analysis)
In the NPRM, the Department proposed adopting the technical specifications in the 2004 ADAAG for ALS that are intended to ensure better quality and effective delivery of sound and information...
- United Cerebral Palsy (UCP)
- Sargent Keypad Mortise Locks
- Populas Accella Adjustable Activity / Computer Workstation
- ES&S ExpressVote® UVS Universal Voting System
- NantWorks LookTel Money Reader App
-
II-8.2000 Self-evaluation
Programs and functions may have changed significantly since the section 504 self-evaluation was completed....
-
2.2 Administrative Requirements.
requirement to conduct a self-evaluation is not extended in the revised regulations, and because many Section 504 self-evaluations were conducted as long as four decades ago and programs tend to change...
-
A. Accessibility standards to apply to websites of covered titles II and III entities
How should the Department address the ongoing changes to WCAG and section 508 standards? Should covered entities be given the option to comply with the latest requirements?...
-
Athletics and Extracurricular Activities
Alternatively, a change that has only a peripheral impact on the activity or game itself might nevertheless give a particular player with a disability an unfair advantage over others and...
-
Falls and Injuries
It goes up to 25 percent more for people who are 20/32 – it’s just a small change, one line....
-
Safe Harbor
But requirements for some elements have changed. Examples The 1991 Standards required one van-accessible space for every eight accessible spaces....
-
RESEARCH NEEDS
It would probably take well in excess of 0.5 s for a motorist to detect that the off cycle was not coming, particularly if the motorist was not expecting a phase change....