A: The Amendments Act was signed into law in September 2008 and became effective on January 1, 2009.3 Congress passed the Amendments Act in part to supersede Supreme Court decisions that...
Search Results "Court"
Filters
Commonly Searched Documents
-
Q2: What is the Amendments Act?
-
III-8.2000 Private suits
At the request of the plaintiff or defendant, and if the court permits it, the Department of Justice can intervene in the civil action, if it determines that the case is of general public...
-
VII. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Judgment may be entered on the arbitrator’s decision in any court having jurisdiction. i....
-
18. What dispute resolution mechanisms are available if a parent believes that a school district has improperly denied or limited his or her child’s access to a particular auxiliary aid or service under Title II or has not made FAPE available under the IDEA?
An administrative hearing decision may be appealed to a State or Federal court empowered to hear such cases....
-
1. Carparts Held That Public Accommodations are Not Limited to Physical Structures
The Court specifically analyzed a “travel service,” which is identified in the statute as a public accommodation, and concluded that Congress clearly intended to “include providers of services...
-
DISPUTES AND ENFORCEMENT
after giving the other Party 45 days’ notice of its intent to seek the Court’s assistance in resolving the matter. 36....
-
What happens if conciliation fails?
If EEOC decides to litigate, a lawsuit will be filed in federal district court. If the Commission decides not to litigate, it will send the charging party a "right-to-sue" letter....
-
Ensure that people with mental health disabilities or I/DD have an equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from the entities’ programs, services, and activities
Developed non-discriminatory eligibility criteria for diversion programs such as community services, specialty courts, or probation programs....
-
§35.164 Duties (Section-by-Section Analysis)
Like paragraph (a)(3), it limits the obligation of the public entity to ensure effective communication in accordance with Davis and the circuit court opinions interpreting it....
-
I. BACKGROUND
(“ADA”) regarding Quicken Loans Arena, located at One Center Court, Cleveland, Ohio (“Quicken Loans Arena”). ...
-
16(i)
(i) On each anniversary of the Effective Date, the ADA Consultant shall also file a report with the Court and the Parties summarizing the hotel owners’ compliance efforts, but not identifying...
-
A. Question 1: Applicability of Section 904.4.1’s Exception
Thus, the answer to the Court’s first question is that 904.4.1’s exception is available in “the above-described circumstances,” and would be applicable if Defendants’ transaction counter...
-
Accessible Jury Boxes, Attorney Areas, and Witness Stands
Advisory 206.2.4 Spaces and Elements Exception 1 explains that the exception allowing raised courtroom stations to be used by court employees, such as judge’s benches, to be adaptable does...
-
J.
The Department filed a lawsuit against Cinemark on March 24, 1999, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, to enforce compliance with the requirements of Title...
-
Will the Voting Rights Act expire?
And in case after case, our courts have held that the right to vote is fundamental. Voting rights will not expire....
-
C.5.i. - Who is responsible for enforcing Section 508? Are there any reporting requirements?
Individuals with disabilities may file a complaint with an agency or bring a civil action in Federal Court for an agency's noncompliance with the requirements of Section 508....
-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY - OPINION & ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRONX INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES, a nonprofit organization; DISABLED IN ACTION OF METROPOLIAN NEW YORK, a nonprofit organization...
-
C. The CVAA Does Not Preempt the ADA or Conflict With the ADA’s Application to This Case
The CVAA Does Not Preempt the ADA or Conflict With the ADA’s Application to This Case This Court has already recognized that the CVAA did not expressly or implicitly preempt the ADA....
-
I.
Cinemark filed suit against the United States in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on January 28, 1999, alleging that the Department's interpretation of...
-
VII. CIVIL PENALTY
The ADA authorizes the Attorney General to seek, and the Court to award, civil penalties of up to $55,000 for a first violation of Title III of the ADA and up to $110,000 for each subsequent...
-
12101(a)(5)
L. 110-325, § 2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that: (5) the holding of the Supreme Court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v....
-
12101(a)(4)
L. 110-325, § 2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that: (4) the holdings of the Supreme Court in Sutton v....
-
Re: SCOTT JOHNSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION - AMICUS BRIEF
I think it's interesting to notice that his amicus is responding to a specific request from the court about a specific section of the ADA Standards. ...
-
Public entities may not discriminate or impose eligibility criteria to screen out people with disabilities
corrections, and justice system leaders have facilitated compliance with this obligation: Forbade use of non-essential eligibility criteria in diversion or re-entry programs that courts...