36 CFR Part 1195 Proposed Accessibility Standards for Medical Diagnostic Equipment NPRM - Preamble

Medical Device Manufacturers

If DOJ amends its ADA regulations as announced in the ANPRM, medical device manufacturers may have an economic incentive to produce accessible products that conform to the standards for health care providers who need to acquire accessible medical diagnostic equipment. The size of the economic incentive will depend on the amount of accessible medical diagnostic equipment health care providers need to acquire and the manufacturers’ incremental costs to design or redesign and manufacture accessible products that conform to the standards.

Many medical device manufacturers currently incorporate accessible features in some of their products such as patient support surfaces that are height adjustable, transfer and positioning supports, and scales designed for use by patients seated in a wheelchair. The incremental costs for manufacturers to conform these products to the standards are expected to be small because the features may already meet or closely meet the standards. The incremental costs may be greater for manufacturers that do not currently incorporate accessible features in their products but plan to do so in future designs or redesigns of their products. The incremental costs to design or redesign and manufacture accessible products that conform to the standards will be incurred voluntarily by manufacturers that choose to produce them for health care providers who need to acquire accessible medical diagnostic equipment. Some manufacturers may choose not to design or redesign and manufacture accessible products that conform to the standards, or may produce accessible products with less market appeal than that of their competitors, thereby losing market share and incurring losses. These economic impacts are not regulatory costs and are not generally social costs because for the most part, one manufacturer’s loss is another manufacturer’s gain.

The following questions in the preamble request comments on the incremental costs to design or redesign and manufacture accessible products that conform to the technical criteria in the proposed standards, as well as alternative and additional technical criteria that the Access Board is considering:

• Questions 9 and 10 on the technical criteria in Chapter M3;

• Questions 14 (a) and (b) on height adjustable patient support surfaces;

• Question 15 (b) on width of patient support surfaces on equipment used by patients in a supine, prone, or side-lying position;

• Question 18 (a) on structural strength of repositionable transfer supports;

• Question 19 (c) on location and size of transfer supports;

• Question 23 (a) on stirrups;

• Question 24 (b) on positioning supports;

• Question 29 (a) on alternative dimension for minimum depth of wheelchair spaces;

• Question 30 on edge protection for wheelchair spaces on raised platforms;

• Question 33 on dimensions for wheelchair spaces on raised platforms;

• Question 34 (a) on alternative dimensions for toe clearance and knee clearance at wheelchair spaces;

• Question 35 (b) on handrails on diagnostic equipment ramps;

• Question 37 (c) on a folding or removable seat on weight scale platforms or other types of diagnostic equipment used by patients in a standing position;

• Question 41 (b) on audible, visible, and tactile communications; and

• Question 42 (a) on operating force for operable parts.

The Access Board will consider the information provided in the comments when preparing the final standards, and will provide an analysis of the incremental costs with the final standards.