BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:icalendar-ruby
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260417T023823Z
UID:183c2dd5-ac49-424e-95a7-259bb4f83c7c
DTSTART:20150611T010000
DTEND:20150611T023000
DESCRIPTION:How Much is too Much: A Systematic Approach to Defending an Und
 ue Hardship Decision\n\nJune 10\, 2015 – 2pm ET\n\nThe legal concept of 
 “undue hardship” comes to us from Title I of the ADAAA. The concept wa
 s intended to recognize that some accommodations are not reasonable. Of al
 l the concepts in the law\, it remains one of the least defined and most d
 ifficult to consistently interpret. The code says an undue hardship is “
 an action requiring significant difficulty or expense”. While “signifi
 cant difficulty” or “significant expense” in the eye of an employer 
 may be quite different than in the eye of an EEOC investigator\, quantific
 ation and justification of an undue hardship decision in response to a req
 uest for reasonable accommodation seems to fall solely on the shoulders of
  the human resources absence manager.\n\nJoin Roy Matheson as he reviews f
 ederal court and EEOC decisions that provide guidance toward making an equ
 itable and defendable undue hardship decision.\n\nThis webinar has been ap
 proved for 1.5 HR (General) credits through the HR Certification Institute
  (HRCI).\n
SUMMARY:How Much is too Much: A Systematic Approach to Defending an Undue H
 ardship Decision
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
TRIGGER:-P7D
SUMMARY:Alarm notification
END:VALARM
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
TRIGGER:-P1D
SUMMARY:Alarm notification
END:VALARM
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:AUDIO
TRIGGER:-PT15M
ATTACH:Basso
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR