BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:icalendar-ruby
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260417T010631Z
UID:9fca10e6-ca4b-47a3-b602-80726e2ca929
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180202T000000
DESCRIPTION:February 2\, 2018\n\nWhat Is ADA Shop Talk?\n\nADA Shop Talk is
  for professionals or business owners who may struggle with understanding 
 the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act Standards or the A
 DA as we call it. If you are worried about lawsuits\, legal exposure or ju
 st want to make your facility more accessible to persons with disabilities
 \, then join Paul &amp\; Mark for the "ADA Shop Talk” Internet Radio Sho
 w. ADA Shop Talk is a fun and informative discussion regarding the applica
 tion of the various codes\, laws and standards that effect business owners
 \, architects\, engineers\, contractors\, code officials\, and consultants
  throughout the the United States.\n\nYour Hosts\n\n\n	\n	Paul Klein love
 s talking taking chances and trying new things. This is one reason why he 
 wanted to create ADA Shop Talk. This is a perfect platform to talk about a
 ccessibility\, help others and play with all the cool gadgets necessary to
  produce the show.\n	\n	\n	Mark Wood loves talking about accessibility an
 d teaching others about access. Being semi retired\, he didn't really want
  to commit to another one of Pauls projects\, but in the end Mark said "wh
 at the hell\, good enough reason to get together\, talk about access and h
 ave a beer"\n	\n\n\nQuestions answered this episode:\n\nDave – In your 
 opinion would an ophthalmology office on the second floor of an office bui
 lding be required to have vertical access provided? An ophthalmologist is 
 actually an MD\, so I am thinking that the elevator exemption might not be
  allowed. Would it be different for an optometrist\, chiropractor\, dentis
 t\, etc. who are not actually physicians? What about a psychiatrist’s of
 fice? Psychiatrists are MDs where psychologists are not. The California Bu
 ilding Code specifically states that offices of physicians or surgeons mus
 t be accessible\, (11B-202.4 Exception 9.2) but not other types of doctors
 .\n\nKeith – Hi there\, (Parcel is zoned commercial) I have a proposed 
 tenant improvement project that is a change of use from an R-3 residence t
 o a commercial use F-1 processing cannabis products and an M occupancy ret
 ail section for people to come into and purchase product. The proposed sit
 e has enough room for a loading zone for vendors bringing a product to the
  facility. However\, there is not enough room to provide parking on this p
 arcel. If the planning department grants offsite parking for this project 
 would there have to be an accessible path of travel from parking to a new 
 change of use building? There would really be no way due to the street and
  no public sidewalks. The proposed off-street parking area is 390 feet awa
 y from the site. If planning department grants offsite parking would there
  be any liability for the path of travel if not provided? Thank you for yo
 ur help on this.\n\nDave- Current California building codes are starting 
 to adopt electric vehicle charging station requirements for parking lots. 
 In a recent parking lot we built\, we installed one EV charging station ad
 jacent to a van accessible parking stall as well as a non-accessible stall
 . This charging station is accessible to both stalls. However\, we are not
  clear as to what (if any) ratio requirement would be for providing a cert
 ain number of charging stations at accessible stalls. As our campus grows\
 , we want to ensure we are providing the necessary amenities to all. Is th
 is something that may need to be addressed with the new code cycle?\n\nDav
 id – Mark and Paul: CBC Division 2 &amp\; 10 establish areas of accessi
 bility for recreation facilities in specific areas (amusement rides\, mini
 ature golf courses\, campgrounds\, boat facilities\, etc.). But what about
  areas not specifically noted such as paintball centers\, zip-line facilit
 ies\, etc.)? Of course\, the parking lots\, access to any public reception
 /gift shop\, restrooms and observation points would need to be accessible.
  But what about the actual areas of activity? Is there an exception somewh
 ere in the code that states that activities requiring specific physical ab
 ility are not required to be accessible? Or are the exempt by omission? Or
  included by omission?\n
SUMMARY:ADA Shop Talk Episode 043 - Vertical Access Not Required For A Medi
 cal Office…..?
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
TRIGGER:-P6D
SUMMARY:Alarm notification
END:VALARM
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
TRIGGER:-P
SUMMARY:Alarm notification
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR